B9. Field-Scale Application of In Situ Treatment Technologies

Remediation and Restoration Alternatives

Presentation Title	Author List	Abstract or Paper PDF	Presentation PDF
Development of a Custom Carbon Amendment Strategy Using Biochar for a Mercury-Contaminated River	C. Dixon, J. Collins, M. Liberati, and N. Grosso	View	View
Mirror Lake Remediation and Restoration: 5 Years Later, Dover, Delaware	J.G. Cargill, U. Ghosh, and E. Patmont	View
In Situ Treatment for PCBs in Sediment: Treatability to Implementation	K. Craigie, G. Braun. S. Ozkan, E. Ashley, and J. Collins	View	View
In Situ Amendment for Sediment Remediation to Preserve Marsh Habitat	R. Faber, M.J. Erickson, P. Vianna, and S. Patil	View
Activated Carbon Placement on the Lower Columbia Slough	C. Owens, A. Reese, and J. Sutter	View
Evaluation of Porewater Reductions Due to Carbon Placement via SedimiteTM and AquaGateTM at a Contaminated Sediment Site	S. Yan, M. Rakowska, T. Hussain, X. Shen, T. Himmer, C. Irvine, J. Eby, S. Ohannessian, D. Janda, and D. Reible	View
Joint Expeditionary Base (JEB) Little Creek: Application of Active Materials as a Component of Contaminated Sediment Remediation	J.A. Collins, S. Patselas, and S. McGee	View
Treatability Study for Under-Pier Activated Carbon Amendment Treatment of Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB)-Contaminated Sediments, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii	K. Markillie, W. Wen, B. Nagy, S. Sahetapy-Engel, and E. Sloan	View