Advanced Tools for Assessing Bioremediation

E4. Modeling and Monitoring Approaches to Improve Remedy Design and Implementation



Abstract or Paper PDFPresentation PDF
Improved Methods for Estimating K with the Hydraulic Profiling Tool (HPT). K.Y. Cha, R.C. Borden, B. Yuncu, and G. Liu.ViewView
Techniques for Evaluating the In Situ Injection Process. T. Sorrells.  ViewView
Using Factor Analysis to Assess Bioremedation Efforts at a Contaminated Site in South America. S.L. Capozzi, C. Merjan, P. Voese, M.M. Chitsaz, L.A. Rodenburg, and E.E. Mack.  ViewView
Improving Decision Making for Vadose Zone Remediation of Volatile Contaminants. C.D. Johnson, M.J. Truex, G.D. Tartakovsky, J. Song, J. Segura, R. Hinchee, and D.J. Becker.ViewView
Must See TV: A Post-Treatment Study Like None Other. B. Brab and S. Noland.ViewView
Quantification of Competitive Sorption of Chemical Species onto Activated Carbon: Unlocking the Modelling of Complex Mixtures. J. Birnstingl, P. Erickson, and K. Thoreson.View 
Case Study: Use of Lines of Evidence to Identify Multiple Sources of a Chlorinated Solvents Plume. F. Biaggioni, M. Scarance, N. Brandsch, and V. Vanin.ViewView
What Microbial Growth Looks Like in the Subsurface: Electrical Imaging of Impacted Sites. T. Halihan, S. McDonald, and M. White.View 
High-Resolution Quantification of LNAPL Transmissivity in Fractured Media. J.M. Hawthorne and L.A. Reyenga.View 
High-Resolution Mobile NAPL Interval Identification and Transmissivity Calculations for DNAPL. J.M. Hawthorne and L.A. Reyenga.View 
Leveraging PRISM™ to Assess Contaminant Flow Pathways: Magothy Aquifer, New York. R.C. Samuels, J. Sadeque, B. Caldwell, and P. Shattuck.View